| 烟草青枯病菌与其拮抗菌解淀粉芽胞杆菌的代谢表型差异分析 |
| 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：汪汉成,黄艳飞,龙明锦,商胜华,史彩华.烟草青枯病菌与其拮抗菌解淀粉芽胞杆菌的代谢表型差异分析.植物保护学报,2017,44(5):753-762 |
| DOI：10.13802/j.cnki.zwbhxb.2017.2016019 |
| 摘要点击次数: |
| 全文下载次数: |
|
|
| 中文摘要:为探究解淀粉芽胞杆菌X60作为烟草青枯病生防菌剂的潜力，采用Biolog代谢表型技术比较了2种细菌的不同代谢表型。结果表明，烟草青枯病菌和解淀粉芽胞杆菌分别能代谢19%、41%的碳源，43%、77%的氮源，95%、86%的磷源以及100%、69%的硫源，分别有94、91种生物合成途径，49、95种渗透压表型以及19、94种pH代谢表型；解淀粉芽胞杆菌比烟草青枯病菌代谢显著的碳源有L-果胶糖、D-甘露糖等34种，氮源有腺苷、胞苷等29种；烟草青枯病菌比解淀粉芽胞杆菌代谢显著的碳源有D-糖二酸、半乳糖醇等9种，氮源有缩二脲、葡萄糖苷酸等11种；解淀粉芽胞杆菌的渗透压和pH环境适应力比烟草青枯病菌强；解淀粉芽胞杆菌具有脱羧酶和脱胺酶的活性。研究表明，2种细菌的代谢表型间存在较大差异，解淀粉芽胞杆菌的碳源、氮源、渗透压及pH代谢表型较烟草青枯病菌的丰富，烟草青枯病菌的磷源、硫源和生物合成途径代谢表型较解淀粉芽胞杆菌的丰富。 |
| 中文关键词:解淀粉芽胞杆菌 烟草青枯病菌 代谢表型 |
| |
| Analysis of the difference in metabolic phenotypes between Ralstonia solanacearum from tobacco and its antagonistic bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens |
| Author Name | Affiliation | E-mail | | Wang Hancheng | Guizhou Academy of Tobacco Science, Guiyang 550081, Guizhou Province, China | xiaobaiyang126@hotmail.com | | Huang Yanfei | College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, Hubei Province, China | | | Long Mingjin | Guizhou Academy of Tobacco Science, Guiyang 550081, Guizhou Province, China | | | Shang Shenghua | Guizhou Academy of Tobacco Science, Guiyang 550081, Guizhou Province, China | | | Shi Caihua | College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, Hubei Province, China | shicaihua1980@126.com |
|
|
| Abstract:In order to assess the potential ability of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens X60 aganist tobacco bacterial wilt, different metabolic phenotypes of the two bacteria were analyzed by using Biolog technology. The results showed that R. solanacearum and B. amyloliquefaciens could metabolize 19% and 41% of the carbon substrates, 43% and 77% of the nitrogen substrates, 95% and 86% of the phosphorus substrates, 100% and 69% of the sulfur substrates, respectively, and exhibited 94 and 91 different biosynthetic pathways; they could metabolize 49 and 95 different osmolytes in 19 and 94 different pH environments, respectively. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens showed much stronger metabolic ability in 34 carbon substrates than R. solanacearum, including L-arabinose, D-xylose and so on; and in 29 different nitrogen substrates, including adenosine, cytidine and so on. In comparison, R. solanacearum showed much stronger metabolic ability in nine carbon substrates than B. amyloliquefaciens, including D-saccharic acid, galactitol and so on; and in 11 different nitrogen substrates, including biuret, glucuronamide and so on. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens showed strong metabolic ability in osmolytes and pH environment than R. solanacearum. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens had both decarboxylase and deaminase activities. The re-sults indicated that there were many differences in metabolic phenomics of two bacteria, phenotypic characters of B. amyloliquefaciens in carbon substrates, nitrogen substrates, osmolytes and pH environments were more abundant than that of R. solanacearum, while phenotypic characters of R. solanacearum in phosphorus substrates, sulfur substrates and biosynthetic pathways were more abundant than that of B. amyloliquefaciens. |
| keywords:Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ralstonia solanacearum metabolic phenotype |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
|
您是本站第 8713444 版权所有：植物保护学报 京ICP备05006550号-2 主管单位：中国科协 主办单位：中国植物保护学会、中国农业大学 地址：北京市圆明园西路2号 中国农业大学植物保护学院 植物保护学报编辑部 电话：010-62732528 电子邮件：zbxb@cau.edu.cn 技术支持： 北京勤云科技发展有限公司 |
