欢迎访问《植物保护学报》网站！

首页 | 期刊简介 |
编委会
编委会
青年编委会
| 道德声明 | 投稿指南 | 联系我们 | 期刊订阅 | English

昆虫隐存种的鉴定方法及其在有害生物防控与物种保护中的应用

引用本文：王茗毅,毛锐锐,周昊,张楚格,魏淑花,张锋,欧阳芳.昆虫隐存种的鉴定方法及其在有害生物防控与物种保护中的应用.植物保护学报,2024,51(3):511-526

DOI：10.13802/j.cnki.zwbhxb.2024.2023096

摘要点击次数:

全文下载次数:

作者	单位	E-mail
王茗毅	河北大学生命科学学院, 保定 071002 中国科学院动物研究所, 农业虫害鼠害综合治理研究国家重点实验室, 北京 100101
毛锐锐	中国科学院动物研究所, 农业虫害鼠害综合治理研究国家重点实验室, 北京 100101
周昊	中国科学院动物研究所, 农业虫害鼠害综合治理研究国家重点实验室, 北京 100101 中国科学院大学生命科学学院, 北京 100049
张楚格	中国科学院动物研究所, 农业虫害鼠害综合治理研究国家重点实验室, 北京 100101 福建农林大学安溪茶学院, 泉州 362406 福建农林大学植物保护学院, 闽台作物有害生物生态防控国家重点实验室, 福州 350002
魏淑花	宁夏农林科学院植物保护研究所, 银川 750002
张锋	河北大学生命科学学院, 保定 071002
欧阳芳	中国科学院动物研究所, 农业虫害鼠害综合治理研究国家重点实验室, 北京 100101	ouyangf@ioz.ac.cn

中文摘要:昆虫中存在很多外部形态高度相似但具生殖隔离的隐存种，这给物种分类和相关研究带来更多挑战。目前，关于昆虫隐存种的研究日益受到关注。该文基于筛选出的368篇中文文献对昆虫隐存种的鉴定方法及其潜在研究价值和应用领域进行系统总结，发现自2003年DNA条形码技术提出以来，关于昆虫隐存种分类的研究迅速增加，已有鉴定方法可概括为4类，分别为分子分类（298篇，80.98%）、生态分类（191篇，51.90%）、生化分类（4篇，1.09%）和细胞分类（4篇，1.09%）。基于单一分类方法的研究最多（241篇，65.49%），其中分子分类的使用最多（172篇，46.74%），其次是生态分类（64篇，17.39%）；基于2种分类方法的研究次之（125篇，33.97%），其中分子分类与生态分类的联合使用最多（124篇，33.70%）；采取3种及以上分类方法的研究较少（2篇，0.54%）。目前，昆虫隐存种鉴定研究主要应用于农业病虫害防治（262篇，71.20%）、物种多样性评估（74篇，20.11%）、疾病防控（27篇，7.34%）和生境保护（6篇，1.63%）等领域。开展昆虫隐存种的研究有利于促进有害生物防控和物种保护，建议未来将整合分类学评估体系纳入到昆虫隐存种研究中并在分类实践中探讨隐存种演化机制。

中文关键词:昆虫纲隐存种整合分类学生物多样性保护

Identification techniques for cryptic insect species and their applications in pest control and biodiversity conservation

Author Name	Affiliation	E-mail
Wang Mingyi	College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei Province, China State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents in Agriculture, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Mao Ruirui	State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents in Agriculture, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Zhou Hao	State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents in Agriculture, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China College of Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Zhang Chuge	State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents in Agriculture, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China Anxi College of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Quanzhou 362406, Fujian Province, China The State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, College of Plant Protection, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian Province, China
Wei Shuhua	Institute of Plant Protection, Ningxia Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yinchuan 750002, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China
Zhang Feng	College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei Province, China
Ouyang Fang	State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents in Agriculture, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China	ouyangf@ioz.ac.cn

Abstract:Cryptic species within insects, which are morphologically similar but reproductively isolated, pose significant challenges to species identification and related research. Increasing attention has been directed towards the study of cryptic insect species. Based on a review of 368 selected Chinese literature sources, this paper comprehensively summarizes identification methods of cryptic insect species, along with their potential applications. Since the introduction of DNA barcoding technology in 2003, research on the taxonomy of cryptic insect species has notably escalated. At present, four primary taxonomic methods are utilized: molecular taxonomy (298 papers, 80.98%), ecological taxonomy (191 papers, 51.90%), biochemical taxonomy (four papers, 1.09%), and cytological taxonomy (four papers, 1.09%). The majority of have relied on a single taxonomic method (241 papers, 65.49%), with molecular taxonomy being the most prevalent (172 papers, 46.74%), followed by ecological taxonomy (64 papers, 17.39%). Additionally, a substantial number of studies have employed a combination of two taxonomic methods simultaneously (125 papers, 33.97%), with molecular and ecological taxonomy being the most commonly used (124 papers, 33.70%). Fewer studies have integrated three or more taxonomic methods (two papers, 0.54%). Applications of cryptic insect species identification included agricultural pest control (262 papers, 71.20%), species diversity assessment (74 papers, 20.11%), disease prevention and control (27 papers, 7.34%), and habitat protection (six papers, 1.63%). The exploration of cryptic insect species enhances understanding for effective pest control and species conservation efforts. This study advocates for the integration of a comprehensive taxonomic evaluation system in the future research on cryptic insect species, aiming to elucidate their evolutionary mechanism in taxonomic practices.

keywords:Insecta cryptic species integrative taxonomy biodiversity protection

查看全文查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器